1 Sep
2006
1 Sep
'06
4:24 p.m.
> I think I said "Windows 95 or
better," which means Windows 1.0, 2.x and
> 3.x are (should be?) on topic.
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Teo Zenios wrote:
I think Win 3.x is much different then anything after
it, might as well be
another OS.
Those differentiations are very subjective.
To me, Win95 is just Windoze 4.00
OTOH, I consider NT to be significantly different.