22 Nov
2007
22 Nov
'07
12:11 a.m.
If I may ask, what was glitchy about video modes in Windows 3.1? I ran
it at 640x480 for years without any obvious video issues...
As an aside, I had Win95 running on EGA for awhile just as an
experiment. On a 386sx-20 with 4mb ram on a 65MB Miniscribe MFM drive.
It ran, but that's about the only good thing I can attribute to the
experience ;).
Josh
Fred Cisin wrote:
> 3.00 would
(and did) run on 8088. One of the font editors that I used
>
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Not only that, it worked properly with a CGA.
3.10 would also work with CGA, but like all video modes, it was somewhat
glitchy. It appears to me that 3.10 was written by people using
800 x 600. With a little playing around, it's probably not too hard to
determine which video board they used.