On 26/06/07, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
As I mentioend [...]
Same thing with pltting graphs. Rather than have a low-resolution
block-graphics display, you added a plotter or an HP1350 and got enough
resolution to produce a _useable_ graph -- not just a pretty picture. Of
course it wasn't cheap, but...
OK, point taken, but really, I think you're sort of emphasizing the
difference and making my point for me. This wasn't a PC, it was an
expensive tool for professionals and scientists. It was a table-top
single-user mini, in a way: expensive on its own and little use
without various peripherals to give it useful I/O.
--
Liam Proven ? Blog, homepage &c:
http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at
gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at
aol.com ? MSN/Messenger: lproven at
hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk ? Skype: liamproven ? ICQ: 73187508