19 May
2005
19 May
'05
10:29 a.m.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:45:44PM -0500, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
Randy McLaughlin declared on Wednesday 18 May 2005
10:26 pm:
TAR doesn't deal gracefully with non-ASCII filename encodings (or
otherwise unconventional names, like spaces in the filename), or
files over a certain size.
There's nothing wrong with TAR as long as the above limitations
don't apply to what you're using it for.
My point at the beginning of the thread was that I don't think
archive programs should be damned simply because they run on a
certain platform. That's extremely narrow thinking. (I'm not
accusing you of that at all, just commenting on the thread responses
in general.)
--
Jim Leonard http://www.oldskool.org/ Email: trixter at oldskool.org
Like PC games? Help support the MobyGames database: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or taste a slice of the demoscene at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
Lately I've been using self-extracting zip
files. The reason is that
just by renaming the file from *.exe to *.zip most decompressors
handle it just fine and for 99% of the people it includes the software
to decompress it.
So, to fan the flames, what's wrong with tar?