19 Aug
2004
19 Aug
'04
6:09 a.m.
Am 19 Aug 2004 10:17 meinte Fred Cisin:
> A
convenience, NOT A SAFETY! , "All-OFF" is trivial to implement with X10.
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Hans Franke wrote:
> Fred, I beg to differ.
> For a workplace, an ALL-OFF switch is a safty measure, and THAT is why I explicitly recommended X10 for
CONVENIENCE,
BUT NOT FOR SAFETY.
Howzbout:
A CONVENIENCE "All-OFF" is trivial to implement with x10;
it is NOT SUITABLE for SAFETY.
Sorry that what I wrote was misinterpreted.
Ey, always blame it on my bad english that I missunderstood you. :)
And more important, on me answering a mail, before reading all others in a thread!
Gruss
H.
--
VCF Europa 6.0 am 30.April und 01.Mai 2005 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/