On Nov 17, 2020, at 7:07 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 11/17/20 3:05 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
That's true for either kind. Also remember
to put the terminators only at the ends. I've seen magazine articles showing a
terminator in the middle (on a T connector)!
How?!
The T is inherently three points; up-stream (cable), NIC, down-stream cable).
Did they connect multiple Ts together?
Did they use a BNC barrel on the unused NIC connection and add a terminator?
There was an article in the magazine RSTS Professional -- unfortunately I don't have
it any longer. It mentioned that you can connect thick to thin coax. That is true; both
are 50 ohm cable so you can use them interchangeably, provided you derate the network to
the lower of the two specs. BTW, that also applies to my comment on transceiver
placement. 10Base2 has no placement rules, which means that a network no larger than
10Base2 limits can be built on thickwire with placement ignored just as well.
What they got wrong is that they showed the splice being made by a T connector that had a
terminator on the third port. So a terminator -- which by definition goes at the
terminus, the end, of the cable, here was put in the middle. That will mess up the signal
integrity very badly.
You're right, any transceiver connection is a T; or as transmission line people would
say, a stub. Stubs are fine if they are electrically short, i.e., a small fraction of a
wavelength in length, and the end of the stub is high impedance. Transceivers are high
impedance circuits so this works.
A vampire tap is one way to build a short stub. The T connector attached directly to the
10Base2 transceiver on the bulkhead is another. A thickwire transceiver connected with an
N/N/N T connector would also work; I haven't see any of those used in practice. The
key thing, as others mentioned, is not to lengthen the stub. You don't put a length
of coax between bulkhead and the 10Base2 T connector if you want the network to operate.
paul