(I suppose
typewriters old enough to not contain computers don't
have keyboards?)
Typewriters were a passing fad of the 19th century.
As may be. Do they not have keyboards? You went off on a long tangent
when replying to this and never got around to answering the point. As
someone else said, what then are those things with all the buttons
labeled with letters &c on them?
Your attempt to redefine `keyboard' is perhaps vaguely amusing, but
both singularly useless (leaving no word for the devices when they're
driven by software that doesn't generate ASCII, or when they're not
connected to a computer at all) and contrary to common - universal, I
would have said before I saw your redefinition - understanding and use.
But when it comes to Alt, you gotta admit that it
originates in the
PC (PeeCee, pee sea, etc) world.
I do? I don't know where it originated.
I also don't much care. Having the buttons there is a Good Thing[%];
nothing compels you to use them in a way you find distasteful (or even
at all); if you like, you could even have your software treat all three
of them as extensions of the spacebar.
What _I_ dislike about the LK401 (and LK201, for that matter) is that
the <X] key and the right Shift key are single keys; I want each of
those to be split into two keys. You can rearrange keys in software,
but software can't give you two keys in a location where there's only
one button-and-switch.
But that's largely a function of what I'm used to.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B