5 Feb
2007
5 Feb
'07
8:44 p.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007 at 20:23, Jim Leonard wrote:
My point is that the basic substrate technology is the same, but just to
be sure, they added 33% more error correction.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
You should read up on DVD technology. DVD-ROM
has 1.32x the
Reed-Solomon error-correction of CD.
I don't see the correlation. What good is better error correction if
it's built on a less reliable technology?