Wait... That Ken Rockwell article says *nothing* about film grain. I even searched it for
the word grain. How on earth can you write an article about the relative resolution of
film without a word regarding grain?!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-10-29, at 12:04 PM, Diane Bruce <db at db.net> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:36:41AM -0700, Zane H.
Healy wrote:
At 3:44 PM +0100 10/29/12, Joost van de Griek
wrote:
Here are some musings on this subject, in regards
to still
photography: <http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/film-resolution.htm>
Referencing Ken Rockwell is another good way to start a flame war.
It is disturbing how many people think he's a credible source.
Though sometimes he is the easiest way to get basic info.
Zane
I'm glad you said it and not me. It needed saying.
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
|
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
Oh why not.
These are some of my shots, mostly snaps.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dyanora/
| My Photography Website
|
|
http://www.zanesphotography.com |
Diane
--
- db at
FreeBSD.org db at
db.net http://www.db.net/~db
Nowadays tar can compress using yesterdays latest technologies!