21 Oct
2006
21 Oct
'06
9:28 p.m.
Jim wrote...
Nothing is more efficient than that. If the compiler
produced code that
was so incredibly obtuse and broken that it took longer to execute an
operation than an interpreter, the compiler was a piece of crap.
You've
obviously never written an interpreter have you.
I call serious BS on the statement "some
interpreters were faster than
some compilers". People are going to have to back that up with actual
examples before it becomes believable.
If you'd read what some of the previous
people have posted on this topic,
you'd get a clue. Instead, I'm left thinking you chose to ignore any input
that isn't what you want to hear.
Jay