25 Apr
2007
25 Apr
'07
11:13 a.m.
Christian Corti wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Chuck Guzis wrote:
That's really strange, because 3M and Scotch are the same company.
Peace... Sridhar
The "Scotch" ones have been an
unmitigated nightmare. Binder bleed
[...]
The "3M" brand are largely recoverable,
with a few missing block
[...]
Does this match everyone else's experience
with these two brands?
Yes, absolutely! All of the Scotch/"no name" stuff (DC300 cartridges
that were used with IBM 5100/5110 here) are a real nightmare (I still
want to save the data on them as they contain many student/research
projects of that era). On the other hand the 3M cartridges (although
they might have small white belts that break) are all fine.