3 Jan
2007
3 Jan
'07
8:37 p.m.
Zane H. Healy wrote:
Surely the current version of the OS wasn't available ten years ago - unless
all Macs included a time travel device, which may well have explained their
high cost... ;-)
Jay West
wrote:
Consider this, it's been nearly 10 years since a Mac containing a 68000 CPU
was even able to run the current version of the operating system. Just because a computer is 10 years old does not
mean it's on topic. So
no, it's not officially vintage ;)
I just what to know if the MAC is vintage
if contains a 68000?