Some of the code is now on bitsavers..
Dave
From: Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com>
Sent: 12 March 2018 14:41
To: Dave Wade <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com>; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic
Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Cc: Lars Brinkhoff <lars at nocrew.org>
Subject: Re: XT/370 microcode
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 05:13 Dave Wade via cctalk <cctalk at
classiccmp.org
<mailto:cctalk at classiccmp.org> > wrote:
. Wikipedia says there were/are
2x68000 CPU's..
One Motorola chip was the custom one, the other was normal (as indicated by mask code).
There was also an Intel math co, presumably derived from 8087.
I used to have an AT/370, which had the same chipset, but I was never able to obtain the
software.
I very strongly suspect the modified 68000 and 8087 have more than just microcode
differences, and that full reverse-engineering of the die would be necessary to accomplish
anything useful with the microcode. Neither chip was designed to be a general-purpose
microcode engine; both were very heavily tailored for their exact visible architecture,
and 370 architecture is enough different that it couldn't be implemented by microcode
only changes with no data path changes; the microcode ROMs and PLAs just aren't big
enough to work around the data path issues.