Even cheaper
than a simple WD1770?
The IWM certainly cost less than a 1770.
Did it? Do you ahve the figures fdor the cost of the 2 devices (in 1-offs
and in 'production' quantities)?
Almost no external support needed.
Still needed some 40mA drivers, didn't it? The industry-standard floppy
drives still used 150 ohm termination at that time. (I still don't really
understand how the later PC drives work reliably with 1K termination using
100-110 ohm impedance ribbon cable and no real control over the source
impedance.)
By using their own drive design, with only the cabling designed into their
products, and not having to support long cables or stubs, Apple avoided
needing high-current drivers. That might even have saved more money in
reduced PCB area than the actual components.
If you're going to allow Apple (or whoever) to make their own drives,
there is no reason why they couldn't have used a 1770 to directly drive a
bit of ribbon cable to a special drive (presumably with inverted signal
lines). That would at least have given a disk which was redable on other
machines.
Interestingly Amstrad, a British manufacutrer who were know nfor cheap
machines and cutting every corner possible used the 1700 seires and
provided '38 line drivers, etc. I do not believe tht Apple couldn't have
done the same (maybe for a tirival price increase o nthe Mac, but if
you're spending that sort of money o na machine that increase is lost in
the noise...) In other words I do not beleive that cost was the primary
motivation for using the IWM.
-tony