All well and good. One tiny point. I worked for DEC Terminals Product Lin=
e
when those items where in current production.=20
I could counter that by saying that while you may well hvee designed
things that used said CRT, and may have handled the CRTs for many years,
this does not mean you know exactly how the CRTs themselves were
designed, and whether they remain sade if you remvoe the front glass layer
I don't beelvie DEC designed the CRT, they bought it in. I am nto even
sure all came from one manufacturer, in which case it may well be that
some CRRTs are safe without the outer glass, some are not. _I_ don't
know, and I'd rather not be showered in glass fagments to find out.
The tubes were just fine without the face plate and
met all implosion
requirements. Some (Green I think) did not have them at all.=20
Interesting. I am suprised there are any differentces between the CRt
other than the phosphor. Why was this? Did all colours of CRT come from
the same manufacturer?
It probably is safe to run the CRT without the outer glass sheet, and I am
sure you know what you are doing.
However certain national safety specifications required the second screen
and its anti splinter layer. This was regardless of if the underlying tub=
e
Now tha I can well believe :-). My experience of safety requirements is
that there are often hoops you have to jump through for no good reason.
How did the green CRTs get roudn this (or were monitors/terminals fitted
with said CRTs simply not sold in such countries?
met the implosion spec. The spec was that it was
present and its material=
s
met the requirements.=20
I think they put them on all the white ones to save having two different
cases.
I am perhaps a bit over familiar with the way I handle CRT's. However in =
I am perhaps too far the other way. My father spend much of his working
life working with UHV systems (and to be fair, the forces on the
envelopedon't really change that much as the vaccum gets harder...) and
had a few things implode. He warned me to take great care...
the
time when I was a student apprentice in the 1960's I did work in a High
Voltage test lab (Anybody for a bit of 500KV?) and the guy I worked for h=
ad
been part of the original EMI television development team in the late 193=
0'.
Guess who got stuck with mending cranky 1950's TV's with live chassis?
Been there, done that... It wasn't so bad on the valve sets with half
wave rectificions, with a bit of care you could ensuee the chassis was
connected to the neutral side of the mains [1] and thus be relatively
safe. The later IC-based sets with bridge rectifiers were worse,
whichever way round the plug was connected, the chassis was live.
[1] A common way to do this was to use one of those neon tester
screwdrivers which would light up if touched on a live chassis. If so,
revese the mains conenctions. A _NOT FUNNY_ 'joke' was to convice the
newbie that if he took his screwdriver apart and turned the neon round,
it would then light on a dead chassis. (Of course it does no such thing,
it still lights on a live one).
"Isolation Transformer Rod? What do you want one
of those for?"
The serivec information for the PSU in one of my Philips machines
includes all the waveforms round the chopper circuit. This is a SMPSU
with a mains bridge rectifier. The instructions for obvserving these
waveforms tell you to use an isolating transformer, or if this is not
available to disconenct the maisn warth wirew in the 'scope mains plug.
Err, i have this slight objection to a 'scope with a live cabinet :-)
I passed all of the safety tests. In those days they consisted of still
being alive when you left.
Seems reasoanble :-)
-tony