26 Oct
2005
26 Oct
'05
1:25 p.m.
Of course manufacturers don't want to use DIPs.
They are
electrically inferior.
Why? Is it just the bulk lead capacitance, or is there some other way
in which a DIP package is electrically deficient?
[DIPs] are bigger, slower, not RoHS compliant, ...
Bigger, yes. Slower, I can't see why, unless it's bulk capacitance.
RoHS compliant, that's a historical accident rather than anything
inherent in DIPs, isn't it? I can't see any reason why a DIP couldn't
be made as cleanly and compliantly as the corresponding surface-mount
part.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B