2 Aug
2007
2 Aug
'07
3:21 p.m.
On 2 Aug 2007 at 19:59, Andy Holt wrote:
Algol 68 was a different attempt to provide an
"Algol with fewer mistake"
but the pendantry of
the precision of declarations was enough to put most people off.
Oh, and we don't talk about ADA (!) :-)
What, no JOVIAL? I seem to recall reading some of that code spun for
NSRDC (or was it NWL?) back in the late 60's.
Cheers,
Chuck