I'm fully aware that a really good manager is a
godsend. I'm also
fully aware that such managers are an endangered species to the point
of practically being a fabled creature.
I once had the fortune to work under a manager who was, as far as I can
tell, a good manager. I don't have wide enough experience to tell
whether he was _really_ good, but he certainly stands out in my memory.
Perhaps I overestimate his quality. But he was good at running
interference; he made the annoying parts of my job that didn't really
have anything to do with what I was nominally there for vanish - that
alone puts him a major step up on my other managers. He was technical
enough to converse intelligently about what I was doing - he probably
could have done, or learned to have done, most of it himself, if he'd
had the time and inclination. He slapped me down when I deserved it.
I don't know whether this particular branch of the conversation amounts
to comparing my selection bias with your selection bias, or whether I
was just lucky, or whether I'm overestimating his quality, or what.
But my experience leads me to think the good manager is not a mythical
creature.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B