On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:04:12PM -0400, Roy J. Tellason wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008 16:14, Mr Ian Primus wrote:
--- "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at
verizon.net> wrote:
The other thing is that attached to that
connector is a little adapter,
which has an RJ-45 socket on the back side of it. The plug side of it has
only a small number of the 25 pins actually installed. If I can figure
out a way to pop the shell open maybe I'll trace it out, otherwise I'll
probably take the ohmmeter approach. :-)
That's pretty common as well for serial interfaces.
Probably got common after I stopped working on this stuff a lot. :-(
We were using RJ-11-based serial gear from Nevada Western in the mid-1980s.
I still have it, and have a bunch in use (a 25-pair telco cable going from
a wall box in my computer room with 8 RJ-11s to a 19" panel with groups of
RJ-11s mounted in the space behind my VAXen in the basement).
We had two successive buildings wired with the stuff - we made our own
pin swabbers to take Emulex CS21 cables and fit them into the pattern
needed by those telco adapter blocks, and filled an entire relay rack
with the 19" panels... to add a new interface, we'd throw the card in
a VAX or PDP-11, cable it up to the back of the relay rack, then install
RJ-11 patch cables to route TX0 or TTA0 or whatever to whatever room we
wanted to login from. Very, very handy.
They were sold
as "kits" with no pins inserted, and a prewired RJ45
connector. You inserted the pins into the DB25 and clipped the thing
together.
Some of those connector shells can be opened easier, some are pretty much
necessary to destroy to open it. If I can get it open, I also have the tool
to remove those pins, if necessary. :-)
You might check the pins before randomly rewiring them... For RJ-45s, the
most common arrangement I've seen is the one presently used by Cisco - the
center two conductors on the cable are both ground, then flanked by TxD
and RxD, then flanked by handshaking lines. Most of the gear I've seen
lately that uses RJ-45s for serial, though, stops with the inner 4 pins.
One handy thing about this interconnection scheme is that you don't
_need_ to change the shells for null modems (though you can). You
can flip one end of an RJ-45 cable (making it unsuitable for Ethernet
use) to make the cable a null modem - the signals are arranged in a
"paired" fashion to make that work.
In practice, the flat cables that Cisco ships are assembled inverted
compared to "Ethernet" cables, so it matters what you grab when you
link up two devices.
OTOH, I rarely use the RJ-45 scheme with DB25 connections, since the
shells are rarer, in my experience, compared to DE9 shells (which are
*quite* common in the Cisco world). At home, for DB25 stuff, I tend
to use my boxes and boxes of RJ-11 stuff, unless I have a connection
that needs "proper" hardware handshaking - then I usually bust out a
"real" cable.
-ethan
--
Ethan Dicks, A-333-S Current South Pole Weather at 12-Apr-2008 at 03:20 Z
South Pole Station
PSC 468 Box 400 Temp -61.4 F (-51.9 C) Windchill -95.8 F (-71.0 C)
APO AP 96598 Wind 11.2 kts Grid 34 Barometer 679.2 mb (10658 ft)
Ethan.Dicks at
usap.gov http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html