On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 18:47, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting view of Palm usage that I hadn't considered.
I didn't use Outlook or a desktop PC PIM at
all.
Nor did I. When I carried a Palm Pilot every day, I was using UNIX
'mail' for work e-mail and did all local edits of my calendar on the
Palm. I did backup my Palm Pilot, to my Linux Laptop (I still have
backups files from 1999 in an archive folder).
Wow. I have never heard anyone using one so stand-alone. Fascinating. Thanks!
What I used mine for was [...]
The Palm was definitely more battery hungry.
NEC V30 at 7.68 MHz, apparently. I guess it was a more frugal chip,
and certainly a very frugal OS.
Psion *nearly* did a deal with Palm to licence EPOC32 as the basis for
the newer ARM-based Palms. I wish that had happened -- it might have
been a much better deal than what did happen for both companies.
Eventually, I got a used Palm V to recharge in the
cradle. I also got
an app to migrate some apps to internal Flash so I wouldn't have to
reload them when my battery did go flat.
I have one somewhere, but I think it won't charge any more. I should
look into cheap repairs.
I _did_ like carrying around a 68000-based portable
machine in a day
when laptops were thick and heavy and had abysmal battery life.
I can see that, certainly.
I
didn't have a mobile phone for the first several years I had a Palm.
Later, when I got a phone, it made phone calls and that was it.
Ditto for me.
Co-workers did experiment with the Palm Treo phone,
but that was far
too expensive for me to consider.
I reviewed an "HP OmniGo 700LKX" with docked Nokia.
http://www.tankraider.com/DOSPALMTOP/hp700lx.html
That was an amazing device, albeit huge, but you could see the
potential. I loved doing wireless IRC and email on the sofa.
It wasn't very integrated but I
carried two devices for a long time (I only upgraded from that phone
from 2000 (nine years later) once it was obsoleted on the network
because it lacked 911-location features and it was blocked from
re-provisioning by changes in regulation in the US market).
Aha. I had a Motorola tri-band TimePort 7089:
http://www.mobilecollectors.net/phone/997/Motorola-Timeport%20L7089
This didn't do predictive text, so I linked it to the Psion via IRDA
and texted from a Psion app.
Then I got a Nokia 6310i:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_6310i
This did T9 wonderfully quickly, but linked via IRDA to my Psion 5 and
later 5MX. I could even make a PPP connection and do email and the
web, slowly but just occasionally amazingly useful. I could also sync,
sort and internationalise my phonebook, backup my SMSes and so on. For
the time, the integration was good.
The Timeport is probably around the time I found myself in a London
pub with a visiting American friend. My friends and I were using SMS
messages to organise when and where to meet. The American commented
that sadly American phones didn't do that and didn't support such
features.
I told them that they did. No, nossir, no way, nope.
So I asked for their number and texted them.
The phone made a noise they'd never heard before and a tiny envelope
appeared above the clock.
They were so shocked and taken aback they nearly suffered an
embarrasing self-control favour. I had to show them how to open the
message. They were utterly aghast.
Probably cost us about $1 each to send and to receive -- years later I
discovered that what drove things like iMessage and WhatsApp is that
American cellphone users paid to _receive_ text messages. This blew
the minds of every European who learned it. We paid a tiny amount to
send them, under 5?, and only when the few thousand you got for free
every month were exhausted -- but no European network ever charged to
_receive_ SMS. Amazing stuff.
Because of my background writing code for the 68000, I
entertained
writing apps for PalmOS but I never managed to do more than get the
SDK and fiddle around a bit. I never completed a project from
end-to-end.
So I liked the Palm Pilot, but I didn't have a Psion to compare it to,
and I can see where you are coming from, from a user experience
standpoint.
I guess the killer thing for me was the keyboard. I did learn Graffiti
-- on a Newton, at first -- but I found it slow and clunky. Psions
were like tiny laptops that went into a jacket pocket. 25-30 hours of
continuous use on 2 AA alkalines, a daylight-readable screen, a
keyboard you could hi-speed thumb-type on (series 3) or touch-type on
(series 5). Usable held in both hands, or if placed on a desk, the
superb hinge designs meant that the screen and keyboard were at a
usable angle, and touchscreen models didn't tip over. 2 storage slots,
wired and wireless comms, sound recording and playback. Nothing ever
came close.
An HP LX was like using a DOS PC compared to a colour Mac.
Annoying music but a demo of a late-model Series 3:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlv1naXDYHs
Demo of the radically different, 32-bit, RISC-based, Psion 5:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nEBnDB79XA
Dropped the dual proprietary storage slots, replaced with 1 standard CF slot.
--
Liam Proven - Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 - ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053