On Thu, 05 May 2005 09:28:40 +0200, Patrick Finnegan
<pat at computer-refuge.org> wrote:
woodelf declared on Wednesday 04 May 2005 10:04 pm:
Parker, Kevin wrote:
Do you know what the popular choice was?
My Guess is IBM-DOS ... MS-DOS only came more
popular with the clones. Now what programing languges
did you have back then? Assembler , Pascal and Fortran
come to mind.
Erm, you seem to have left out BASIC, one version of which didn't require
you to have disks to use (ROM BASIC); however, that was probably more
useful on the 5150 PC than the 5160 PC/XT since the PC had a cassette
interface you could use with it, which the XT lacks.
From 1980 onwards I worked for a computer center which was one of the
original IBM PC-vendors (in Norway, but the release was worldwide - we
were sworn to strict secrecy before the launch). We never sold any
casette-only or single-sided diskette models. I recall that we had a
number of boxes with CP-M 86 on the shelf, but we never sold a singele
one. We also had UCSD-Pascal(an odd operating system, reasonably
cross-platform), but almost everybody bought PC-DOS.
All the IBM 8088-based PCs had ROM BASIC. That was not really useful for
very much, except that you had a functioning computer even if you started
it without a boot diskette. When the XT came around, we also got COBOL
compilers which relied on BASIC for BCD arithmetic and conversion
functions. When the first clone PCs arrived, the COBOL applications and
compiler did not work on them until somebody came up with a TSR to replace
the IBM BASIC interpreter.
Most serious programming was done in Assembler, including large
applications like word processors. FORTRAN was also much used, and an
important banking application was made in IBM Pascal. All the compilers
were very expensive. The big breakthrough for hobbyist programmers came
with Turbo Pascal, the first affordable development tool for the PC.
--
-bv