From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
On 06/04/2013 02:01 PM, Ken Seefried wrote:
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at
neurotica.com>
One would reasonably think so, but it generally
doesn't work out that
way.
[rant deleted]
I'm not sure what you are responding to with this, but it's certainly not
related to what I wrote.
Actually it was.
Perhaps in the sense that you got to my note and hit 'reply', but a rant
about patching embedded systems, out-of-tree development and how everyone
in management is stupid doesn't strike me as a reply to NetBSD dropping
803886 support because no one stepped up to take on the task. If that's a
direct response, then all I can do is avoid eye contact, back slowly away
and repeat "there's still no one, before or after support was dropped, for
all the years that anyone could, who's taken on the job of keeping it in
the tree, and that's the only reason it doesn't exist". I'm sure
you'll
find reason to dispute that, but I don't see taking the time to puzzle out
the entrails of your inevitable reply for actual meaning.
P.S. - While I
get it's your standard dismissive
line,
It certainly isn't; I'd not treat you in that manner. That's why I
explained my point of view.
To be fair, you have a lot of standard dismissive lines: for Windows users,
for people who don't much care about what processor their tool works on,
for programmers who use a programming language you don't approve of, for
management and a cornucopia of other ones. It is hard to keep track, but
this is pretty clearly the one for people who you think don't understand
embedded systems. We've seen it a lot in this thread.
it's a bad assumption that I don't have
extensive experience with
embedded systems and production operations.
Likewise.
Well, given the frequency you feel the need to remind us, not like I could
miss it. And, admittedly, I've not trotted out my experience to bludgeon
anyone who disagrees with me. So, how could you possibly not lecture me
like a schoolboy. So...point taken.
KJ