6 Sep
2018
6 Sep
'18
5:15 p.m.
On Sep 6, 2018, at 1:09 PM, allison via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 09/06/2018 12:54 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
True. Did the VT05 use core memory for that? I vaguely remember it did.
Still, it was strange to go backward from 20 x 72 (VT05) to 12 x 80 (VT50).
While the VT05 isn't all that well known, it probably deserves recognition as the most
interesting looking DEC terminal.
paul
On 9/6/18 9:48 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Mostly about screen memory which back
then was small and not cheap. VT50 seems like it was someone's mistake --
12 lines, what were they thinking?