jr-IDE for PCjrs (Re: XT-IDE V2 PCBs)

Now we really are talking apples to oranges. The one I posted was a fully enclosed Wiznet package, but this one is a board. In fairness, you don't have a board option for the Lantronix, so that point I will concede, but I'd rather have a box. And you haven't addressed the criticism I made two posts ago: the Wiznet has an inconvenience where if its settings get fouled, you need an external machine that already has Ethernet to send it new configuration information (at least the protocol is documented, but it is not a fully self-contained solution). The Lantronix can be reset from the computer it is connected to. I'm just going to conclude by saying I really do like the Wiznet for what it is, but the Wiznet is cheap, and you get what you pay for. If the Lantronix is overkill for your application, fine, but I get a lot more mileage out of my UDS modules than the Wiznet modules I have. I'll shut up now, since this is probably not helping Michael decide. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com -- Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever. -- Napoleon Bonaparte ---------