1 Sep
2006
1 Sep
'06
4:37 p.m.
On 9/1/2006 at 4:40 PM Sean Conner wrote:
I think I said "Windows 95 or better,"
which means Windows 1.0, 2.x and
3.x are (should be?) on topic.
How about WFWG 3.11? :) Personally, I don't see that much internal
difference between Win95 and WFWG with Win32s installed. Sure, the desktop
looks different, and there are some passing nods to plug-n-pray, but under
the skin, they're more similar than they're different. OTOH, NT 3.1 is
very different and precedes 95, but still holds much in common with XP.
And Warp precedes 95 and is still supported.
This software stuff is giving me a headache.
Cheers,
Chuck