Don't they just! I come across tons of folks
wanting to replace their 4:3
CRT with an LCD in arcade cabinets all the time. I wonder why, with all
the niche electronics in the world these days, some company hasn't made
panels with 640x480 display resolution at large sizes as replacements. I
guess the companies that make LCDs just aren't interested (yet). I have
noticed a few niche CRT makers trying to fill that gap. CRTs look better
than LCDs do in many cases because of the cheap anti-aliasing you get from
the phosphor and interlacing (just my opinion). However, LCDs offer some
nice advantages these days.
Yea, for the classic arcades (70s, 80s, early 90s?) people tend to stick
with CRTs but for the later computer based games people use scaler boards
and LCDs. They shove widescreen LCDs in the cabinets and end up with this
tiny picture in the middle where the large 29" monitor used to be.
Large panels would be a godsend for me, I have early
onset macular
degeneration in my retinae. I get that folks think I'm crazy for not
buying a 4k panel and then jacking up the fonts. What those folks don't
seem to understand (at all) is that I've already tried it. Yes, Windows,
MacOS, and to some extent Linux have features to crank the fonts way up in
your windowing system and for most applications.
There are plenty of widescreen lower resolution panels? 720p and 1080p
televisions?
Some jerkhole sales guy in the Apple store got
offended when I mentioned
(privately & quietly to a friend that was with me) that I hated the new
"retina" displays on their gear not only because of the squint (and yes, I
know MacOS has pretty much the best hi-res support going), but also that
the screens lacked an anti-glare coating (if they have any, it doesn't
work worth a darn). The guy comes over, interrupts us and gives me some
angry rant about how people like me need to "get over" anti-glare coatings
because they "distort" 4k displays. I told him that I wasn't speaking to
him and didn't need his help or input, but if I was I'd say something like
" Who gives a **** about the resolution if you can't see it over the
glare? " That's what I get for going into an Apple store in the first
place, though. My bad.
I think my MacBook has anti glare coating on the retina screen, but I
don't really use it outside. There are apps that let you directly set the
resolution but that just gets you tiny text.
I think I probably could. I also think that if I had
to use a scan
converter it might be possible to use older systems with it. The problem
is that the scan-converter would need to support 1920x1920 and
sync-on-green. That's something that I doubt any of them would do, but who
knows what the future holds. The fact that this monitor is new and was
made at all gives me some hope.
I don't think a SGI would support that resolution? Or are you driving it
with a PC? That resolution is definitely non-standard.
- Ethan