On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:55:52PM +0100, Pete
Turnbull wrote:
  On 13/10/2008 21:57, ethan.dicks at 
usap.gov
wrote:
  2200pF does sound reasonable.  I am one of those
who never grew up
 using nF, so I don't tend to use it (I learned milli-microfarad from
 my father for pF, he, in turn, was a Ham in the 1950s). 
 I hope you didn't, because it would be wrong :-)   One milli-microfarad
 is one nanofarad; I think you meant to write micro-microfarad, or more
 likely you meant to write nF instead of pF. 
 Ah, yes... micro-microfarad.  My bad.  I hadn't heard the term since I
 was about 10 and just mis-remembered it.  I have seen old (1970s)
 construction articles in "Popular Electronics", etc., refer to "mmf"
 on occasion - presumably micro-microfarad. 
An analogy for you Americans comes to mind, as Obelix's "Ils sont fous,
ces romains!" ;-))
Christian