From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at siconic.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:43 PM
*Everything*
is a proprietary binary format, and in the grand scheme
of things, compression is simply a binary encoding. That's why I
think damning a certain archiving program/format just because of the
platform it runs onis silly.
This misses the point entirely. With a ZIP archive you are munging the
raw data into something it is not. I guess if you wanted to be psycho you
could also consider ASCII to be a "proprietary binary format", but 40
years of history and standardization would disagree with you.
See Dwight's last reply re: archivist standards. Putting stuff in a ZIP
file is NOT archiving.
I see people on the thread complaining about
having to bundle a
windows emulator with each archive. Excuse me? Let's look at some
popular formats: TAR, ZIP, RAR all have source-code unarchivers.
Which means they can run on any machine with a C compiler. So
what's with all the paranoia? Just use whatever works as long as
more than one major platform can extract it.
For now. What about 1 year from now? 5 years? 10 years? 50 years? 100
years? 500 years?
Think LONGTERM.
(Not directed at Sellam, just commenting on all
thread participants.)
Ain't no thang ;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage
mputers ]
[ and academia at
www.VintageTech.com || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
There is no guaranteed method to go 500 years, the only reasonable thing is
to go with the best available.
In this case best means a format understood by the majority.
In the future ZIP formats will be better understood than any other current
format for the simple reason there are more zip files to examine than any
other.
Packaging data understood by a tiny fraction of the world guarantees that it
will be near impossible to use in the future.
Randy