4 May
2010
4 May
'10
9 p.m.
Jim Leonard wrote:
On 5/4/2010 2:06 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
When what you're comparing is orders of magnitude faster. You can argue
that CISC != RISC or that one CPU is totally different than another, but
when I say your 16MHz processor is slower than my 2933MHz processor,
it's a useful measure.
That is until you have to access memory. :(
Ben.
They
weren't that slow, 27Mhz compared to the PS2's 33Mhz.
Polygon-wise, the
Since when has the master clock frequency been a useful measure of
procesor speed?