Thanks for that. My memory is now refreshed!
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591nw.johnson at
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/Turnbull_XXDP_Feb93.pdf
<http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/Turnbull_XXDP_Feb93.pdf>
This doc gives an overview of the naming.
The leading C means PDP-11, but is not used in the file names on the xxdp packs and
floppies - you'll see it in the listings though.
Cheers
Sytse
> On 18 Feb 2022, at 03:12, Nigel Johnson Ham via cctalk<cctalk at
classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> From my (very stale) memory, FWIW
>
> DEC Diagnostic file names were configured thus:
>
> First Letter - machine they run on. ones I remember: Z=all Unibus,
V=LSI-11(18-bit), J=11/73(22-bit) etc. Strangely, I seem to remember that C represented
11/45, but maybe they changed the scheme at one point. I got into sales and management
with Emulex after the 11/73A! Or perhaps the letter C was prepended as a media type and
the rest follows the pattern
>
> Second and third letters, the system part they were designed for. Strangely, VMSxxx
would be memory tests for the LSI-11, nothing to do with VMS/
>
> Fourth letter was the actual diagnostic name if more than one for each part.
>
> Fifth and sixth letters were major and minor rev levels.
>
> So really the names were only unique to four positions.
>
> When running them, I would usually only type the first four letters followed by two
question marks.
>
> So maybe ZUF and ZXD were amalgamations of various tests!
>
> Or maybe they changed the scheme :-)
>
> cheers,
>
> Nigel
>
>
> Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
> Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
> Skype:TILBURY2591nw.johnson at
ieee.org
>
>
>
> On 2022-02-17 20:26, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:28 PM Chris Zach via cctalk
>> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>> Hey all!
>>>
>>> While going through floppies I found these and was wondering what they
>>> were. Only clue in Google was someone asking in 1997 same thing.
>>>
>>> BL-T540B-M1 CZUFDB1 USER TESTS
>>> BL-T541B-M1 CZXD1B1 FIELD SERVICE TESTS 1
>>> BL-T542B-MC CZXD2B0 FIELD SERVICE TESTS 2
>>> BL-T565B-MC CZXD3B0 FIELD SERVICE TESTS 3
>>> BL-T583B-MC CZXD4B0 FIELD SERVICE TESTS 4
>>>
>>> Any ideas? The first one does not have a write protect tab, the others
>>> do. There is also one other disk I found
>>>
>>> CZMX4E0 Micro 11 Maint RX50 4
>>>
>>> On this one the write protect flag was torn off (was on from factory and
>>> removed)
>> My guess is that these are Micro-11 diagnostic test disks, as
>> mentioned in Section 5.7 USER TEST DISKETTES, on Page 5-12, of this
>> manual:
>> MicroPDP-11 Systems Technical Manual, EK-MIC11-TM-002
>>
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/microPDP11/EK-MIC11-TM-002_MicroPDP1…
>>
>> These possibly related tests are listed as being included as part of
>> the XXDP distribution on page A-22 of the PDP-11 Diagnostic Handbook,
>> 1988
>>
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/PDP11_DiagnosticHandbook_1988.p…
>>
>> ZUFlEO.BIN MICRO-11 USER TEST #1
>> ZUF2EO.BIN MICRO-11 USER TEST #2
>> ZUF3AO.BIN MICRO-11 USER TEST #3
>> ZUF4AO.BIN MICRO-11 USER TEST #4
>>
>> If you have the ability to create ImageDsk images of these disks it
>> might be interesting to take a look at them.