I know
it's kind of a petty, splitting-hairs issue to users, but Linux
isn't Unix. It just looks and acts like it....
If it looks like a duck, acts like a duck, and is source code compatible
with a duck....
So by that reasoning you would say that DR-DOS *IS* MS-DOS?
Or that TurboDOS *IS* CP/M?
I'm sorry, but I don't buy it.
And to think that I derided Clinton for wanting the judge to provide a
meaning for the word "is"...