30 Oct
2010
30 Oct
'10
2:38 a.m.
On 2010-10-30 01:12, Rich Alderson<RichA at vulcan.com> wrote:
From: Johnny Billquist
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:46 PM
Well, it is obviously not a definition DEC agrees with, so I guess that
means there are two different schools (atleast) here.
And when talking about the VAX (which this thread started with), it
might be meaningful to use DEC's definition?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> Why are people so hung up on physical
memory size vs. virtual memory
> size when they need to define what virtual memory is?
> I just don't get it.:-)
Perhaps because that's the way the term of
art "virtual memory" (whether
as segments or as pages) has been defined since it was first conceived?
Virtual addressing is necessary for virtual memory. The converse is not
true.