-----Original
Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of David Riley
Sent: 11 April 2012 14:47
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Equivalent of an A55 Transistor
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
Looks like there is an MPSA55 and an MPSA55G. The
MPSA55 is a
Darlington transistor, according to Farnell; I recently learned a
little
about
those repairing my RD53 motor control board, and
my understanding
is that
the gain is even higher with those. Given that it seems I need
less gain
than
the MPSA55G provides, the straight MPSA55 would
seem unnecessary.
However, Farnell will charge me a lot because it has to ship them
from the
US to the UK. An Ebay seller here in the UK seems to have the
Darlington
variety, so I could get some of those sooner and cheaper. The
alternative
seems to be an MPS2907AG from Farnell
http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/search/productdetail.jsp?sku=1611212.
What would people advise?
Darlingtons are not 100% replacements for standard transistors.
Among
other things, the voltage drop across the base will be twice
normal, which
could screw up the biasing for something designed around 0.7V drops.
There's a reason (well, a few) that they're not used everywhere.
Looking at that page of the schematic, it looks carefully biased.
A casual examination leads me to believe that it's biased to
trigger the
discharge of the 555 when its base voltage reaches a certain level
(i.e. a
crude switching power supply), but I could be entirely wrong about
that; I
only looked for a few minutes. In any case, given how expensive 1%
resistors were in 1978, I'd venture to say that you probably
wouldn't want
to
upset the bias point by swapping in a Darlington
pair.
- Dave
Thanks, hadn't thought about that! I won't use the MPS055 then for
sure.
^
\-- I take it
that's a typo
Farnell's web page is wrong. MPS-A55 is a simple bipolar PNP, not a
Darlington.
Everything I see suggests the MPS-A55 is the intended transistor
type, but as others have said the app does not appear heavily
demanding and anything meeting the basic specs should do. I expect
the 2907 you listed earlier will be fine.