On 01/27/2013 09:14 PM, Tony Aiuto wrote:
I should have been clearer in my post.
In my experience, most people who won't use webmail justify their
position not on the superiority of mail clients, but on the opinion
that they prefer having their mail in their position, and not "in a
cloud server some where". I'm not going to debate if that is true or
not. It's just what I have had too many people tell me.
But, if you want to keep several clients in sync with your mail, you
need to keep the definitive repository somewhere, usually your inbox.
I was pointing out the willful blindness of people who believe IMAP
servers are less "in the cloud" then a webmail server. Indeed, most
webmail servers, Google's included, provide IMAP services.
So, my, unsaid, staring piont is that mail clients give you no more
ownership over your mail than web mail.
Of course you are correct. Indeed, a webmail program is, on the
server side, a mail client with a remotely-implemented GUI. This being
a technical forum, I'd be shocked, and a bit dismayed, if anyone here
didn't know that.
In my case, I run my own mail server. Whatever mail client(s) I use,
be they textual, graphical, or graphical-with-a-remote-GUI like a
webmail client, is still backed by the mail server that I control...not
a mail server run by the world's largest data collection, indexing, and
mining company.
(yes, there was a hint there)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA