2 Nov
2011
2 Nov
'11
8:57 p.m.
On 11/2/11 4:32 PM, "Kieron Wilkinson" <lists at softpres.org> wrote:
3) The bit about saying that "most people
don't have the knowledge to decode
flux recording" - I am not sure why we would say that - since people have
already done it using our documentation. Perhaps this refers to a conversation
on opening IPF (again, nothing to do with KryoFlux), where we said we didn't
make it a priority because we didn't think it would be very much use to most
people (but we always said it was an absolutely necessary). It's now open
anyway.
I apologise for paraphasing, the tone of what I wrote was what I read into
it from y'alls FAQ...
-
"Preserving software is not a one-click process although the Analyser has
advanced features built in that help working on a disk very fast.
Nevertheless, in the hands of an untrained person, the analyser will not be
of much use."
-
What is the use of providing software, hardware and a -supposedly- open disk
image format when one cannot apparently create that disk image format
(presuming it was designed to be a universal image archive format) with the
supplied software? If it will be added later, that is great.