As I've said a few times, things are
*different*...
Different...and harder, it appears, since at a minimum you need
less
common (and more expensive) tools,
Less common in the workshops of people who do
nothing but
through-hole assembly perhaps.
Less common in stores, too, IME. I have seen cheap soldering irons and
guns on the shelves of numerous hardware-store places, alongside tins
of flux and wire-format solder. I cannot recall ever seeing solder
paste, or hot-air guns suitable for surface-mount work. Similarly, I
have often seen decent soldering irons in catalogs, but can't recall
seeing corresponding SM tools alongside them. Does your experience
differ? It has admittedly been a while since I looked.
As I said above...it's clear you don't like
surface mount technology,
and you're going to PICK PICK PICK at any positive thing anyone says
about it,
Whereas you think surface mount can do no wrong, and will not accept
any criticism of it. (Yes, that's an exaggeration, but so is your
summary paraphrase of my posts.)
The original claim, as I recall, was that surface-mount is harder to
work with than through-hole. I believe that is true - to get
comparable ease of work, you need additional, rarer, and/or more
expensive tools, at a minimum, and even then I don't think it's really
fair to call it comparably easy to have to use, say, a magnifier....
This has little to nothing to do with whether I like SM, its inherent
positive attributes, such as higher component density and easier
pick-and-place, or its contextual advantages, such as better
availability for many parts. (Or its assorted disadvantages, for that
matter.) You may like it. You may choose to use it for a design
(independent of whether or not you *like* it). I still maintain it's
harder to work with than through-hole.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B