Robert Nansel wrote:
OK, I'm building the bit-serial ALU for my 2N2/256 project. Though
it sounds exceedingly elementary, one design variable I haven't been
able to figure out is what supply voltage I should use.
Does anybody know why the 7400-series TTL used +5V for Vcc? I've
looked at the equivalent circuits for TTL and LSTTL. Maybe I'm
missing something, but it's not immediately obvious to me why such
circuits couldn't operate on, say, 4.5V or 6V. I understand the need
for good regulation to maintain noise margin, but why in 1964 did
Texas Instruments chose 5V in particular for TTL? Was it just an
arbitrary choice, or is there a deeper issue?
(I sent a couple of messages regarding the origins of the 5V level to the list
a few weeks ago, but I don't have a definitive historical answer as to such.)
On the technical side though, the supply level is going to effect power
consumption, hence operating temperature range, drive and loading factors,
propagation speed due to stored charge (RC factors), switching
thresholds/limits due to varying current thru an R into a transistor base, etc.
At the electronic level, there are a lot of analog issues in digital design.
Then of course there are junction breakdown voltages, some literature I have
here suggests there isn't really a lot of spare room outside the specified
operating voltages. Then there are edge-triggerred flip-flops which rely on the
stored charge in some of the transistors for the edge-triggerring and which I
suspect will start doing funny things outside the specs, again due to RC factors.
(As mentioned in an earlier message) I don't know whether the 5V was an
initial, somewhat-arbitrary design parameter from which other design factors
followed, or if the opposite: a design factor which followed from other initial
parameters.
One guess is it was a minimum chosen to keep junction breakdown requirements
and power dissipation low, while providing enough headroom for switching
currents and adequate noise margins.
Either way, once it has been set in the design, the above-mentioned device
specs and characterisations are going to be determined and specified relative
to the preferred supply level. Note that manuf. specs typically provide both
absolute maximums (over which the device may be damaged), as well as operating
max/min within which the other specs are guaranteed. The specs typically don't
say that it won't actually work outside the operating range
Fairchild databooks generally have quite a treatise about the functioning of
the internals of the IC families at the beginning of the book which can make
for interesting reading, TI books less so, in Nat Semi books it seems to be non-existent.
A year or two ago there was a discussion on the list where we were testing a
variety of 74x175's (albeit configured in an odd manner) for some PDP-8 front
panel and were observing changing and idiosyncratic behaviour over a very
narrow operating voltage range.
I hope you're not looking to mimic TTL - you'll have trouble sourcing
multi-emitter transistors in discrete form. (I know - it's outside your design
constraint anyways.) More seriously, looking to TTL or standard DTL ICs for
design would kind of chew up the transistor count very quickly. Is there a
reason you're not looking to period/original discrete-component logic designs?