Dilog DQ132 question

I guess my first question would be - If you're running on an 11/83 under RSTS/E, why WOULDN'T you want to use 22-bit addressing? Surely you're not "wasting" a perfectly good 11/83 on V6C or V7.0 ? ;-) But, to answer your question - My interpretation is that you can: Use 22-bit addressing, in which case RSTS/E (V8.0 and above) will see the controller as a TSV05, and will use 22-bit addressing to access memory above 256K (when applicable). You'll note that if you do a HAR LIST under RSTS/E V8.0 or above, it will flag this drive as "extended features enabled", indicating that it can use the full 22-bit address range. or Set 18-bit addressing, in which case RSTS/E (V7.0) will see the controller as a TS11, which will ONLY be able to access 256K of memory without modification to the device driver. (V8.0 and above might (properly) recognize it as a TSV05 either way, however, the "extended features" will be disabled, and it will only be able to access 256K of memory.) If I left anything out, I'm sure someone will chime in. . . . Tim