The hardest part of the process is distilling the
functional specification
 of the part you are trying to replace. This is the heart of the topic. Some
 ways this can be done:
  If adequate documentation exists, use it.
 Observe the part's behavior in-system
 Build a test bench to observe behavior of part outside of system
 General leetness 
 There is no one approach, it is more art than science.
 For going from a functional specification to a synthesizable model, this
 is simply writing HDL.
 I suggest this book, which covers the basics of this process.
 
 Thanks,
 - Ian
 On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Toby Thain <toby at telegraphics.com.au>
 wrote:
  On 2016-06-20 3:35 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
 In my recent studies of electronics (I'm a noob for all practical
 purposes) I keep seeing folks refer to Verilog almost as a verb. I read
 about it in Wikipedia and it sounds pretty interesting. It's basically
 described as a coding scheme for electronics, similar to programming but
 with extras like signal strength and propagation included. Hey, cool!
 Why are folks referring to "Verilogging" and "doing a verilog" on
older
 chips. Is there some way you can stuff an IC into a socket or alligator
 clip a bunch of tiny leads onto it and then "map" it somehow into
 Verilog?
 Is that what folks who write emulators do?
 
 They firstly go by documentation, and if that fails, reverse engineer,
 painfully. This is why preserving, archiving, publishing documentation is
 so incredibly important!
  Ie.. they exhaustively dump 
  Verilog code for all the chips then figure out
how to implement that in
 
 You can't in general get Verilog *out* of a chip. It goes the other way.
 You can compile Verilog into gates and netlists etc.
 some computer programming language like C ? What do folks do for ROM chips
  and PLCs? I'd think they must dump the code
and disassemble it. No?
 
 Yes, they do that where possible.
  I'm just curious and this is a tough question
to answer with Google since
 I'm pretty clueless and don't know the right words to search for. I
 notice
 
 You can google "EDA tools". You can also grab toolchains from major
 vendors like Altera and play with Verilog/VHDL and simulate the results,
 too.
 people talk about correcting their Verilog code, so it must be somewhat of
  a manual process. I'm just wondering how
someone even gets started with a
 process like that.
 
 I'd suggest hitting some textbooks, not Google.
 Niklaus Wirth's book is fantastic, for people more comfortable in
 software, if you take it step by step:
 
https://www.amazon.ca/Digital-Circuit-Computer-Science-Students/dp/35405857…
 --Toby
  -Swift