On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Eric Smith wrote:
As far as I know there wasn't any
"standard" CP/M 8-inch double-density
disk format, with many vendors doing their own, incompatible formats, but
was there any reason to prefer any one of those formats over any other?
Well, my personal preference is 8 x 1024, or 15 x 512 (which makes life a
little simpler for interchange with systems that require extra work to
switch out of 512 byte sectors).
But, in 1979?, I asked Gary Kildall what he would recommend as a standard
format for 5.25". He replied, "The standard format for CP/M is 8"
SSSD."
I tried, with NO success to convince him that because DS, DD,
and 5.25" WERE going to happen, that specifying secondary standards
(DS, DD, 5.25" SSSD, 5.25" DS, 5.25" DD, 5.25" DSDD) would go a
long ways towards preventing a situation of thousands of mutually
incompatible formats. He politely made it very clear that he had NO
interest in creating secondary standards.
"The standard format for CP/M is 8" SSSD."
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com