Alexandre Souza wrote:
Hmm. DOS does
have the advantage of not getting in the way of doing such
things (and I've already got a DOS PC for Imagedisk work). Plus it's
nice to
have short startup times (and even faster shutdown ;)
The only downsides:
2) Lack of remote administration (control via serial port or network
would
be handy in some cases).
Who told you? You can run "doorway"
:) You know I figured there were probably a few things out there, at least for
console apps. Presumably stuffing received input from the network into the
keyboard buffer though and handling video updates direct from video memory
(even in text mode) raises some interesting issues.
It's a tricky thing to do I suppose if the DOS machine happens to support more
than one app, and in this case I could see there being at least a couple
(something to do SCSI/SASI archive and retrieval, something to do floppy disk
archive/retrieval).
At the end of the day if it has to have its own display and keyboard then
that's the way it has to be :) I just like the idea of being able to just
flick the switch on the box to power it off and on, boot from something like a
CF card (remember archive reads/writes will be to a remote system, and DOS
itself won't place high write demands on a CF card), and just telnet/serial
link "into" the machine to control it.
That sort of thing lends itself much better to a Unix environment, but
unfortunately Linux (at least) just puts too much stuff inbetween the user and
the bare metal to make data recovery type work easy.
I keep going round in circles here :)