CP/M TCP/IP (was Re: CP/M coding question)

from time to time. It makes sense that the 1MB address space would have to

In my previous post, I deliberately left Rabbit out. I played with that board, wanting to implement a fairly little simple TCP/IP server for my weather station. While it claims a 1MB address space, your code executes in two 8K sliding windows. And apparently, arraning windows or some BS like that is left to the user. All I know for sure is that I'm a fairly experience micro person, and I couldn't get it to work. My object file was something like 43K with their stack compiled in. And it was claimed to be "too large". The limited help I got from Rabbit was an example of how to do it, which was a complete re-write of my code, and not in a way that made sense. It's a little difficult to explain, but in spite of Fred Eadys paid endorsement for them, it sucks. With all the other choices in micros out there, the Rabbit is best left in the dumpster^wbox. --John -----Original Message----- From: cctalk-admin(a)classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Tom Uban Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:48 To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org Subject: Re: CP/M TCP/IP (was Re: CP/M coding question) You could use a Rabbit board: http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/ --tom