On 08/12/2012 09:57 PM, Lance Lyon wrote:
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
Sent: Monday, 13 August 2012 10:32 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: To all with interest in IBM 7090
We certainly don't need SATA, but we have it
anyway.
Seriously, what's there to dislike about it? Faster, hot swappable, smaller
cabling -
I DO NOT dislike it. I didn't say I disliked it. I never mentioned
whether I liked it or dislike it. What I said was, "we didn't need it."
We already had a disk interface that was faster, hot swappable, and
with smaller cabling. Now we have about three more!
For the record, I happen to like it. I like them all, because they're
(mostly) all pretty well-designed. What I DO NOT like is IDE, because
it sucks.
If you've been keeping track, that's SEVEN storage interfaces that
have been mentioned in this thread, and I (as if you actually CARE)
"hate" precisely ONE of them. But that didn't stop this inexplicable
reaction:
the haters will just keep on hating anything new
unfortunately.
...and the knee-jerk labelers will just keep on labeling anything they
read here, regardless of whether or not the point being made has gone
squarely over their heads, even though it was spelled out in plain English.
WTF?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA