17 Jun
2020
17 Jun
'20
10:28 a.m.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Rob Jarratt via cctalk wrote:
I concur. And I also would like to mention a simple, easily navigable
web interface to list archives, which works well in text based
browser. Just like the current one. Having such interface is a huge
plus for me. It allows both access to single threads, message by
message, and getting full mbox for more sophisticated processing (in
theory at least, since I have no such needs yet).
"Modern" interfaces, while touting their bestness, are about removing
as much power from end user as possible, IMHO.
--
Regards,
Tomasz Rola
--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_rola at bigfoot.com **
-----Original
Message-----
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Al Kossow via
cctalk
Sent: 17 June 2020 13:55
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
I would agree with both of those too.
Rob I wonder what you don't like about
"groups.io" Its pretty much a
pure mailing list?
Like all of the webby time-wasters, they don't have easy to mirror
zipped archives, because they want to to spend time hovering
around clicking on their sites.
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/
The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on
attachments.
Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.