28 Mar
2012
28 Mar
'12
12:17 a.m.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Mouse wrote:
Quite easy; indeed, it's almost been done, or the things wouldn't be
endangered.
Remember, "environment" means the whole environment, including (eg)
humans, not just things like weather and soil with all the other issues
wished away. To put it another way, trees grow very poorly in the
presence of humans who consider survival of the trees as a species of
small value compared to having the land cleared.
To be fair, trees seem to come back just fine when an area is left to
nature. The Chernobyl area is a testament to that.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Because when the environment has been destroyed and
there's no place
that the "damn" trees will grow [...]
I think you really have no idea
how difficult it is to destroy the
environment to the extent that you propose.