21 Apr
2002
21 Apr
'02
3:07 p.m.
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote:
I'm willing to bet that your shop isn't populated with $600
off-the-shelf bundled systems.
I've seen PC/Windows shops with remarkably high uptime-to-downtime
ratios. None of them were running bargain equipment.
Doc
No, I wouldn't pay that much, but I wouldn't
pay out more than, say $25 for
all the UNIX boxes on the planet either, and that only if they were already
broken down into their varous scrap types, e.g. steel, aluminum, plastics,
etc. I've yet to see even one piece of software that would be of serious use
to me that runs under UNIX. I know that I could force myself to use Netscape,
but I really don't want to.
That's fine by me. There's room in the world for just about any
mindset, and as long as your views are held by the majority, my tools
and my toys are cheap.
see below, plz.
I doubt anyone willing to make the inane comments
you've made so far could
provide any sort of support.
Now, Richard. Flattery will get you nowhere.
If my comments seem inane to you, it may simply be due to the fact
that I don't take myself all that seriously, nor do I believe that my
own knowledge is the sum total of all truth.
Concerning my capacity to provide support, let me steal a quote from
the Jerry Springer Show.
"Yew don't knoooow me! Yew don't know who Ah am!"
Really
high-end PC hardware isn't much better than midrange, but
low-end hardware is a verifiable black hole. To wit, it is guaranteed
to suck.
Low-end would cost on the order of $150.
You'd starve on our service work.