--- "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
Here is an odd question for everyone. In a printed
article, which
would be more accurate? "Apple ][", "Apple II", or
"Apple 2"
That's probably open to interpretation, and depends on
the machine you're referring to. I _believe_ that the
original Apple II, the II+ and the early IIe's were
identified as "Apple ][" (at boot), but later IIe's
and the IIc were written as "Apple //". And then the
GS got written as "Apple IIgs".
I typically have always used the "Apple II" because it
works for all machines, and looks good in any
typeface. The brackets look OK, but are kinda funny
when used in file names, and you can't use the // in
file names at all, for obvious reasons.
Rarely is the Apple II ever referred to as the Apple
2.
Or, you could just avoid the whole mess alltogether
and call it the "Extremely popular fruit-named
company, 1980's market dominating, expandable personal
computing system". And most people will know what
you're talking about.
-Ian