On Jan 23, 2018, at 3:19 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
From: Grant Taylor
I can fairly clearly see the RG-8/U on the side
of the cable that David
is holding ... Sure, there was probably a better alternative that came
along after, with better shielding and marking bands.
You keep mixing up the 3 Mbit and 10 Mbit. _They were not the same_. (I
_really_ need to retake those photos with a ruler in them...)
The stuff with better shield, marking bands, etc is 10 Mb; it's about 1.05cm
in diagmeter. The black stuff (the stuff Dave is holding in the video) is 3Mb;
the piece I have is .95 cm.
The Ethernet spec says that the cable OD is in the range .365 to .415 inch, which is 9.27
to 10.54 mm. The nominal OD of RG-8/U is .405 inches, or 10.28 mm, which is within spec
for Ethernet cable.
One place where the two cable specs differ is in the velocity factor, 0.66 for RG-8/U and
0.77 for Ethernet cable. That relates to the dielectric -- solid polyethylene for RG-8/U
and foamed material (unspecified) for Ethernet. Also, Ethernet requires a solid inner
conductor (for the tap) while RG-8/U may come stranded. (Maybe only in some variants,
I'm not sure.) And there are the stripes, of course, but those have no electrical
significance. You can use a tape measure if you don't have the stripes.
paul