4 May
2010
4 May
'10
6:08 p.m.
On 5/4/2010 2:06 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
When what you're comparing is orders of magnitude faster. You can argue
that CISC != RISC or that one CPU is totally different than another, but
when I say your 16MHz processor is slower than my 2933MHz processor,
it's a useful measure.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
They
weren't that slow, 27Mhz compared to the PS2's 33Mhz. Polygon-wise, the
Since when has the master clock frequency been a useful measure of
procesor speed?