>>>> "Michael" == Michael Sokolov
<msokolov at ivan.harhan.org> writes:
Michael> So if halon is really so benign, why did they ban it?
Enviroscares.
I'm puzzled by some of the earlier discussion. In particular, the
"displace all air" stuff sounds bogus. I remember the Halon setup in
our lab at DEC; I don't think those tanks were anywhere near big
enough to displace a substantial fraction of the oxygen from the
room. Note that the body works perfectly well with substantially less
air than you get at sea level -- that's how you function in an
airplane.
From what I remember, the concentration of Halon in the
air for fire
suppression is only a few percent. The real puzzle is how that can be
-- there's lots of oxygen left, yet the fire goes out. I don't
remember the mechanism. But the key point is that, as far as I have
heard, Halon does NOT function by "displacing all oxygen from the
room".
paul